data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f687/8f68727855dd62d2e53539e78f545e9a9f993010" alt=""
One thing I've learnt is that I should never judge a music prize. I seem to come up with different results. Maybe that's how competitions are - despite all our training and rationality, we are still influenced by our own experiences and preferences - but do still have faith that the professionals do it better. I only caught the final two players and I won't go into reasons (although I have some) but I would have given it to the violinist over the guitarist. Then, in the end, the violinist got no prize. Strange and bewildering to my ear. I walked out chatting to a woman who had different choices again. I enjoyed the vivacity and application and variety of program that Joshua Hu presented: San Saens, JS Bach, a modern work by Eugene Ysaye, Paganini and Tchaikovsky. What a program! But the judges saw things I didn't. Strange how it works. But competitions have value to a performer, for the winnings but also for the CV and future career, so they demand serious thought. I'm sure they got it; I just thought differently. Not for the first time. BTW, guitarist Callum Henshaw (who I missed) came first.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a3c6/7a3c694aa6d99ca1d42d73fdf53bed0aaf4b6776" alt=""
2 comments:
So wait ... You only saw half of the competition but feel entitled to give your opinion on the result? Seems rather uninformed ...
I only meant my preference of the two I heard. Obviously I can't comment on the other two. Sorry if that's not clear. Eric
Post a Comment